The Linear System Problem
A startling 35% of users report owning unused glue sticks, suggesting a disconnect between possession and utilization. This underuse is compounded by a troubling disposal rate; one-third of glue sticks are thrown away because they dry out, and a staggering 93% end up in general waste. The economic repercussions are clear, with sustainable options like those offered by UHU & Pritt costing three times more than their conventional counterparts.
The design of glue sticks, while user-friendly, harbours a linear business model that fails to consider the product’s end-of-life. The majority of the embodied energy and carbon footprint is attributed to the material and packaging, which also pose significant environmental threats. Despite the increasing use of natural ingredients and a decrease in PVA usage, the lack of visible labels on recyclability and the absence of infrastructure for sustainable materials like plant-based plastics create a barrier to eco-conscious choices.
There are some existing product service systems such as Terracycle that aim to recycle goods such as glue sticks. Terracycle provides two options. The first option is for the consumer to take the product to a Terracycle location and put it in a box, where the box is then sent to Terracycle where products such as glue sticks are separated by material composition, cleaned and melted into hard plastic that can be remoulded to make new recycled products. The second option aimed at establishments is to buy a zero-waste box, from 180 to 280 pounds, and fill it with empty glue sticks (or other glue containers) and then post it for free to Terracycle. However, this is inconvenient for users which reinforces the high amount of glue sticks that end up in general waste.
What Needs to Change?
Insights for what needs to change within this product sector can be divided into two distinct categories - Product Level and System Level.
At the product level, it is evident that disassembly poses a significant challenge, often due to concealed parts within the design. Addressing this issue by simplifying disassembly processes could greatly enhance the potential for end-of-life recycling and reuse. Moreover, personalization emerges as a crucial factor, as imbuing products with a sense of personal connection for users could foster greater care and attachment, thereby extending product lifespans. Additionally, there is a growing imperative to reassess the materials used in product manufacturing, particularly considering a transition towards more environmentally friendly alternatives labelled as 'Eco' materials. Furthermore, both packaging and product labelling should prioritize clear communication about sustainability attributes and recyclability to empower consumers with informed choices.
At the system level, enhancing consumer engagement stands out as a key objective. The system should prioritize providing engaging and informative experiences that seamlessly integrate sustainability principles into consumer lifestyles, thereby making sustainable choices more convenient and accessible. Furthermore, educational institutions should play a central role within the system, serving as hubs for disseminating knowledge and fostering sustainable practices among students, individuals, and businesses alike. Additionally, a fundamental shift towards a circular system model is recommended to minimize reliance on linear consumption patterns, thereby reducing landfill waste and promoting the adoption of sustainable practices throughout the entire product lifecycle.